CooperSurgical has acquired ZyMōt Fertility, a subsidiary of DxNow, Inc. Read the full announcement here.

Simplify Support and Service with CooperSurgical

Get INSORB­® and Lone Star® Direct from the Manufacturer

Since 1990, CooperSurgical has partnered with surgeons to provide trusted solutions for patient care. Now, we’re making it easier than ever to access our portfolio of highly reliable medical devices and supplies through our new direct-purchase program. 

This streamlined approach offers: 

  • Simplified ordering for ease and efficiency 
  • Faster, personalized customer support 
  • Direct relationships for tailored solutions 

Now Available for Direct Purchase

INSORB® Absorbable
Skin Stapler

  • Reliable, simple closure- deploys 30 absorbable staples1,2* 
  • May reduce operative time vs. sutures2,3 
  • Eliminates percutaneous insult4,5† 
  • Improved comfort & cosmesis compared to metal staples4,6 
  • May result in less pain immediately post-op6‡ 
Lone Star

Lone Star® Retractor System
and Elastic Stays7 

  • Customizable, hands-free retraction for optimal access and visibility 
  • Continuous, unobstructed exposure throughout surgery 
  • Flexible, adjustable retractor rings for various surgical sites 
  • Secure, customizable stays that adapt quickly to site anatomy 
  • Repositions to reveal deeper layers as surgery progresses 

Contact your local representative for more information

Name(Required)
What product are you interested in? (select all that apply)(Required)
Disclaimer

By pressing submit you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

 * When used in accordance with its Instructions For Use 
† For proper technique www.insorb.com/IFU 
‡ In C-sections
 
1. Bron, T., & Zakine, G. (2016). Placement of absorbable dermal staples in mammaplasty and abdominoplasty: A 12-month prospective study of 60 patients. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 36(4), 459–468. 
2. Patel, V., Green, J. L., Christopher, A. N., Morris, M. P., Weiss, E. S., Broach, R. B., & Butler, P. D. (2021). Use of Absorbable Dermal Stapler in Reduction Mammoplasty: Assessing Technical, Quality-of-Life, and Aesthetics Outcomes. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open, 9(8), e3784–e3784. 
3. Madsen, A.M., Dow, M.L., Lohse, C.M., & Tessmer‐Tuck, J.A. (2018). Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial. BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 126(4), 502–510. 
4. Dresner, H. S., & Hilger, P. A. (2009). Comparison of incision closures with subcuticular and percutaneous staples. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, 11(5), 320–326.    
5. Insorb Instructions for Use. 
6. Nitsche, J., Howell, C., & Howell, T. (2011). Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 285(4), 979–983. 
7. Lone Star Instructions for Use. 
 
Important Safety Information: Refer to Instructions for Use, for detailed instructions and risk information, www.insorb.com/instructions-for-use and www.coopersurgical.com/lone-star-ifu
 

Wave-Purple-2